Showing posts with label SECURITIES FRAUD. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SECURITIES FRAUD. Show all posts

Friday, October 10, 2014

COURT GRANTS SUMMARY JUDGEMENT IN MRI INTERNATIONAL INC., PONZI SCHEME

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 23111 / October 10, 2014

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Edwin Yoshihiro Fujinaga and MRI International, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2:13-CV-1658 JCM (CWH) (D. Nev.)

SEC Obtains Summary Judgment Win On Liability in Ponzi Scheme Case

On October 3, 2014, the Honorable James C. Mahan, United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, granted the Securities and Exchange Commission's motion for summary judgment on liability against defendants Edwin Fujinaga and MRI International, Inc. on all charges against them, including violations of the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws.

In a case originally filed on September 11, 2013, the SEC alleged that Fujinaga and his company, MRI, perpetrated an elaborate Ponzi scheme designed to misappropriate money from investors. The SEC alleged that the defendants raised more than $800 million from thousands of investors living primarily in Japan under the ruse that MRI was using their investments to buy medical accounts receivable from medical providers at a discount to recover their full value from insurance companies. The SEC alleged that the defendants used the investments to pay back earlier investors, and that Fujinaga used investor funds for his own purposes, including to buy property and luxury cars. In granting summary judgment in favor of the SEC, the court found that "Fujinaga had sole control over investment funds, using them for his own personal benefit" and, "[w]hile depleting the pool of collected investments, Fujinaga facilitated a Ponzi scheme funded by new investments."

The court's summary judgment opinion finds that Fujinaga and MRI violated Sections 17(a)(1), (2), and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The court has not yet determined the appropriate relief against the defendants, and the litigation is ongoing for remedies purposes. The SEC's case is also continuing against multiple relief defendants, who the SEC alleges received and used investors' funds.

For further information, please see Litigation Release Number 22832 (October 3, 2013) [SEC Obtains Asset Freeze and Other Emergency Relief in Ponzi Scheme Targeting Investors in Japan].

The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Financial Services Agency of Japan and the Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission of Japan in this matter.

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

FORMER HEPPELWHITE INVESTORS GET COURT APPROVED $6 MILLION DISTRIBUTION

FROM:  U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
Court Approves Distribution of $6 Million to Former Heppelwhite Investors

The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that on October 2, 2013, The Honorable Paul G. Gardephe of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, entered an Order approving a Final Distribution Plan for the Fair Fund established in SEC v. Hochfeld et al., 12-CV-8202. In this enforcement action, filed in November 2012, the SEC charged Berton M. Hochfeld and his entity Hochfeld Capital Management, L.L.C. with securities fraud for misappropriating assets and making material misstatements to investors in the Heppelwhite Fund, L.P., a now defunct hedge fund. The Court previously entered judgments against Hochfeld and HCM which ordered, among other relief, injunctions, an asset freeze, and disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and civil penalties in amounts to be determined.

To distribute funds to defrauded investors, the SEC requested that the Court create a Fair Fund, which the Court approved on July 31, 2013. The Court appointed Nancy Chase Burton, a Supervisory Assistant Chief Litigation Counsel at the SEC, as Plan Administrator. To date, the SEC has collected approximately $6.2 million for the Fair Fund. Pursuant to the Final Distribution Plan, thirty-five former Heppelwhite investors will receive this month initial payments from the Fair Fund representing approximately 70% of each investor's prior capital balance in the Heppelwhite Fund. The Final Distribution Plan also provides for a second round of payments to investors that the Fair Fund will make after the SEC has collected additional funds, including proceeds from the sale of Hochfeld's personal assets.

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

3 CORPORATIONS, 6 INDIVIDUALS CHARGED IN BIOFUELS FRAUD SCHEME

FROM:  U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT 
Wednesday, September 18, 2013
Six Individuals, Three Corporations Charged in Indiana-based Biofuels Fraud Scheme

The Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Indiana announced today the return of two indictments against six individuals and three companies for offenses involving federal renewable fuel programs, allegedly creating losses to victims totaling more than $100 million. The 88 counts included in the three charging documents include allegations of conspiracy, wire fraud, false tax claims, false statements under the Clean Air Act, obstruction of justice, money laundering and securities fraud.

“Congress enacted incentives for the production of biofuels to make the United States stronger and more energy independent,” said Robert G. Dreher, Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division. “Fraud by parties claiming such incentives threatens these important public policies. The Justice Department will vigorously prosecute those seeking to line their pockets using scams like those alleged in this indictment.”

 “This morning, federal agents brought into custody individuals who allegedly operated the largest tax and securities fraud scheme in Indiana history,” said U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana Joseph H. Hogsett. “This case represents a collaborative effort on the part of law enforcement to hold fully accountable those who seek personal profit at the taxpayer’s expense.”

“The Renewable Fuel Standard Program was designed to achieve greenhouse gas emission reductions, promote energy independence and expand our nation’s renewable fuels sector,” said Cynthia Giles, Assistant Administrator for Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). “Today’s action supports these goals by protecting the integrity of the biofuel market. Those that cheat the system are breaking the law, and undermine our commitment to protect public health and the environment.”

“We are proud to work with our federal partners to identify and investigate groups that manipulate and utilize federal government programs to line their pockets by fraud,” said Robert A. Jones, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI Indianapolis Division. “In doing so, they deceive their customers, their shareholders, and the American public. The FBI will continue the fight against this dishonest and fraudulent behavior which harms the American people and the American economy.”

“The indictments returned today send a loud message that IRS Criminal Investigation operates year round to protect the integrity of our tax system and today is a victory for the American people,” said James C. Lee, Special Agent in Charge, IRS Criminal Investigation. “Together with the cooperative efforts of our law enforcement partners, we were able to identify and vigorously investigate the fraud involved in this scheme.”
 
 The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 created a number of federally-funded programs that provided monetary incentives for the production of biodiesel. A dollar-per-gallon tax credit was available only to the first person to blend the pure biodiesel (known as B100) with petroleum diesel. After the biodiesel was blended and the tax credit claimed, the resulting product was generally known in the industry as B99, meaning that it was approximately 99 percent biodiesel and 1 percent petroleum diesel. Additionally, biodiesel producers could generate and attach credits known as “renewable identification numbers” or RINs to biodiesel they produced. Because certain companies need RINs to comply with regulatory obligations, RINs have significant market value. These two incentives were available only once for any given volume of biodiesel. For these reasons, a gallon of B100 with RINs and an available tax credit was worth much more than a gallon of RIN-stripped B99. At times during the conspiracy, a gallon of B100 was worth up to $2.50 more than an equivalent gallon of B99.

 Four of the defendants—Craig Ducey, Chad Ducey, Chris Ducey and Brian Carmichael— operated E Biofuels, a Middletown, Indiana company that held itself out as a producer of biodiesel from “feedstocks” such as animal fat and vegetable oils. The government alleges that these defendants conspired with Joseph Furando and Evelyn Katirina Pattison—two executives with a pair of related New Jersey-based companies that operated under the names Caravan Trading Company and CIMA Green—to purchase RIN-stripped B99 from third parties, pretend that E-Biofuels had produced that fuel at its Middletown facility and fraudulently resell that fuel to customers as B100 with RINs and an available tax credit. While the E-Biofuels facility was capable of producing B100, at times during the conspiracy it was producing no fuel of its own, but instead was simply acting as a pass-through facility for fuel purchased elsewhere.

 The indictment alleges that beginning in July 2009 and continuing until May 2012, these defendants fraudulently sold more than 35 million gallons of RIN-stripped B99 to unwitting customers who paid an inflated price, thinking they were purchasing B100 with RINs and an available tax credit. All told, the customers were allegedly defrauded of more than $55 million as a result of these activities and the Internal Revenue Service was exposed to as much as $35 million in false claims.

 The government alleges that the defendants delivered the fraudulently mislabeled fuel to the victims in one of three ways. In some cases, the biodiesel was transported from fuel terminals to the E-Biofuels facility in Middletown where it was unloaded into a holding tank. A short time later, the biodiesel would be reloaded into tanker trucks and delivered to unsuspecting customers along with fraudulent paperwork that misidentified it as B100 with RINs produced by E-Biofuels. On other occasions, the truck drivers did not unload the fuel when they arrived at Middletown plant. Instead, they simply picked up paperwork falsely stating that the truck contained a load of B100 with RINs that originated at the E-Biofuels facility. The truck drivers referred to this procedure as “flipping a load.”

 Finally, in the most egregious instances, the truck drivers hauled RIN-stripped B99 from fuel terminals directly to customers. Because these loads never went to the E-Biofuels facility they were known as “ghost loads” or “phantom loads.” In those cases, the defendants faxed or e-mailed the false paperwork to the truck drivers along their routes between the fuel terminals and the customer locations.              

 In May 2010, E-Biofuels was purchased by Imperial Petroleum, a publicly traded company based in Evansville. After the acquisition, E-Biofuels accounted for more than 97% of Imperial Petroleum’s operating income. Defendant Jeffrey Wilson was the president and chief executive officer of Imperial Petroleum.

 The government alleges that Jeffrey Wilson and Craig Ducey knew that E-Biofuels was purchasing biodiesel from third parties instead of making its own biodiesel. They hid this fact from Imperial’s investors, shareholders and outside auditors by falsely stating that E-Biofuels produced biodiesel from chicken fat and other feedstocks. They made these and other related false statements and omissions in Imperial Petroleum’s annual and quarterly reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in written and oral communications with Imperial Petroleum’s investors and outside auditors.      
 
 If found guilty, the six individuals charged by indictment face up to 20 years in federal prison on some counts, as well as significant fines. The three companies indicted today also face significant fines and other regulatory action. The defendants were scheduled for initial appearances before a federal magistrate judge today.

 An additional defendant was charged today by federal information, and has petitioned the court to enter a plea of guilty and cooperate with investigators.  Brian Carmichael was charged with one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States. Carmichael has filed a petition with the court indicating his willingness to plead guilty to this charge. Carmichael faces up to five years in federal prison if convicted.

The case is being prosecuted by Senior Litigation Counsel Steven D. DeBrota of the U.S. Attorney’s Office, along with Senior Counsel Thomas Ballantine of the Environmental Crimes Section in the Department of Justice’s Environment and Natural Resources Division, and Jake Schmidt, a Special Assistant U.S. Attorney of the U.S. Attorney’s Office and Senior Attorney for the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 An indictment is only a charge and is not evidence of guilt. All defendants are presumed innocent and are entitled to a fair trial at which the government must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
 
 The collaborative investigation that led to today’s arrests was the result of work by the EPA’s Criminal Investigation Division, the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation, the FBI, the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Indiana Department of Environmental Management.

Saturday, May 5, 2012

U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT RETURNS $44 MILLION TO VICTIMS OF QWEST COMMUNICATIONS FRAUD


FROM:  U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Thursday, May 3, 2012
Justice Department Returns $44 Million to Victims of Qwest Communications Fraud
WASHINGTON – The Justice Department has returned approximately $44 million to victims of a securities fraud scheme related to Qwest Communications International Inc., Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, U.S. Attorney John F. Walsh for the District of Colorado and Special Agent in Charge James F. Yacone of the FBI’s Denver Division announced today.

The $44 million in funds were forfeited to the United States as a result of the 2007 federal conviction of Qwest’s chief executive officer, Joseph P. Nacchio, for securities fraud.  The forfeited funds are being returned to 112,210 victims who incurred losses on Qwest securities purchased during the fraud scheme.

Between 1999 and 2002, Nacchio publicly announced unrealistic revenue projections for Qwest and then caused Qwest to issue false and misleading statements to the public about the company’s financial condition, as part of his scheme to commit securities fraud.  After the irregularities were discovered, Qwest stock, which had traded as high as $60 per share, plummeted to about $1 per share.

Following his conviction, Nacchio was sentenced to 70 months in prison and was ordered to forfeit $44 million in funds, the net proceeds he received from the fraud scheme.  Nacchio was also ordered to pay a $19 million fine, which, by law, was paid to a fund for victims of crime.

“Securities fraud is a particularly insidious crime because it undermines public confidence in the financial markets,” said U.S. Attorney Walsh.  “I am pleased that we were able to recover more than $44 million in criminal proceeds and return it to innocent Qwest investors.”

“Following his conviction for securities fraud, Mr. Nacchio was ordered to forfeit $44 million,” said Assistant Attorney General Breuer.  “Today, we are fulfilling a central objective of the Criminal Division’s Victim Asset Recovery Program and returning those funds to the victims of Mr. Nacchio’s crime.”

“In addition to seeking criminal prosecutions to protect our financial markets, seizing and forfeiting ill-gotten gains is a priority for the FBI,” said FBI Special Agent in Charge Yacone.  “We are hopeful the money being returned will remedy some of the damage caused by Nacchio.”  

The criminal case against Joseph Nacchio was prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Colorado and the Justice Department’s Criminal Division.  The case was investigated by the FBI.

The distribution of funds to victims was authorized and overseen by the Department of Justice’s Victim Asset Recovery Program in the Criminal Division’s Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section.  The Victim Asset Recovery Program is comprised of a team of experienced professionals, including attorneys, accountants, auditors and claims analysts, who work with federal prosecutors, regulatory agencies, financial investigators, claims administrators and the private bar to recover assets from financial crimes and return them to the victims.  In hundreds of cases, the program has successfully utilized its specialized expertise to efficiently convert forfeited assets into victim recoveries.

Monday, March 5, 2012

CEO'S COMPANY SOLD CMO'S NOW CEO MUST PAY $10,000,000


The following excerpt is from the SEC website: 

"Washington, D.C., March 2, 2012 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that a federal judge has ordered the former CEO of Brookstreet Securities Corp. to pay a maximum $10 million penalty in a securities fraud case related to the financial crisis.

The SEC litigated the case beginning in December 2009, when the agency charged Stanley C. Brooks and Brookstreet with fraud for systematically selling risky mortgage-backed securities to customers with conservative investment goals. Brookstreet and Brooks developed a program through which the firm’s registered representatives sold particularly risky and illiquid types of Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (CMOs) to more than 1,000 seniors, retirees, and others for whom the securities were unsuitable. Brookstreet and Brooks continued to promote and sell the risky CMOs even after Brooks received numerous warnings that these were dangerous investments that could become worthless overnight. The fraud caused severe investor losses and eventually caused the firm to collapse.

The Honorable David O. Carter in federal court in Los Angeles granted summary judgment in favor of the SEC on February 23, finding Brookstreet and Brooks liable for violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as well as Rule 10b-5. The judge entered a final judgment in the case yesterday and ordered the financial penalty sought by the SEC.

“Brooks’ aggressive promotion and sale of risky mortgage products to seniors and other risk-averse investors deserves the maximum penalty possible, and that is what he got,” said Robert Khuzami, Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. “Those who direct such exploitative practices from the boardroom will be held personally accountable and face severe consequences for their egregious actions.”

Rosalind Tyson, Director of the SEC’s Los Angeles Regional Office, added, “The CMOs that Brookstreet sold its customers were among the most risky of all mortgage-backed securities. This judgment highlights the responsibility of brokerage firm principals to ensure the suitability of the securities they sell to customers.”
In addition to the $10,010,000 penalty, Brooks was ordered to pay $110,713.31 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest. The court’s judgment also enjoins both Brookstreet and Brooks from violating Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act as well as Rule 10b-5.

The SEC is awaiting a court decision in a separate Brookstreet-related enforcement action filed in federal court in Florida. In that case, the SEC charged 10 former Brookstreet registered representatives with making misrepresentations to investors in the purchases and sales of risky CMOs. Two representatives settled the charges, and the SEC tried the case against the remaining eight representatives in October 2011.
The SEC has brought enforcement actions stemming from the financial crisis against 95 entities and individuals, including 49 CEOs, CFOs, and other senior officers.

Friday, October 21, 2011

TWO COMPANIES AND A MAN ALLEGEDLY PUMPED AND STOCK FOR FINANCIAL GAIN

 
The following excerpt is from the SEC website:
October 18, 2011
“The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that on October 14, 2011, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas entered a judgment against Jason Wynn, of Plano, Texas, and two companies under his control – Wynn Holdings LLC and Wynn Industries LLC. The Commission’s amended complaint alleged that Wynn and his companies violated the antifraud and registration provisions of the federal securities laws through a scheme to pump and dump the stock of four issuers: Beverage Creations, Inc., My Vintage Baby, Inc., ConnectAJet.com, Inc. and Alchemy Creative, Inc.
The Commission alleged that Jason Wynn and his companies (1) purchased tens of millions of shares directly from the issuers for pennies per share, (2) touted the stock to investors through a nationwide marketing campaign, and (3) immediately dumped their shares into the public market at grossly inflated prices when no registration statement was filed or in effect. Wynn created artificial demand for the stocks through various ad campaigns, emails and misleading promotional mailers. While the promotional mailers disclosed that the Wynn companies received the stock being touted, they did not disclose that Wynn and his companies intended to sell that stock into the artificially inflated market created by the promotions.
The judgment permanently enjoins Wynn, Wynn Holdings, LLC and Wynn Industries, LLC from violating Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The judgment also bars Wynn and his companies from participating in any penny stock offerings and provides that they will be ordered to pay disgorgement and civil penalties determined by the district court at a later date. Wynn and his companies consented to the entry of the judgment without admitting or denying the allegations in the Commission’s amended complaint.
Previously, on January 3, 2011, the district court entered a judgment against stock promoter Carlton Fleming and certain entities under his control – Regus Investment Group LLC and Thomas Wade Investments, LLC. The Commission’s case against the remaining defendants – Ryan Reynolds and companies under his control – is pending. The Commission acknowledges the assistance of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) in this matter.”

Monday, May 16, 2011

JUDGE FINDS FRAUD IN SECURITIES CASE

The following is an excerpt from the SEC Web site:

" Securities and Exchange Commission v. North American Clearing, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 06-08-cv-829-Orl-35KRS (M.D. Fla.)
On April 27, 2011, Judge Mary Scriven found Richard L. Goble liable for committing fraud and aiding and abetting his clearing firm’s violations of the Customer Protection Rule and books and records provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in SEC v. North American Clearing, Inc., et al., Case No. 6:08-cv-829-Orl-35KRS (M.D. Fla., May 28, 2008). North American Clearing, Inc., was a broker-dealer that acted as the clearing firm for approximately 40 correspondent firms and more than 10,000 customer accounts. Goble, a former FINRA board member, was the founder, sole owner, and a director of North American.
Following a five-day bench trial, the judge found “it clear from the evidence of record, that North American had financial problems and Defendant Goble and North American’s executives made a substantial effort to conceal it.” Specifically, the judge found Goble acted with the “highest degree of scienter” in directing North American to falsely record a $5 million money market purchase, which artificially lowered the firm’s reserve requirement under the Customer Protection Rule and allowed North American to improperly withdraw more than $3 million from its Exclusive Benefit of Customers (EBOC) Account. The Court further found this “sham” transaction constituted fraud on the market.
As a result, the Court permanently enjoined Goble from violating Sections 10(b), 15(c)(3), and 17(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5, 15c3-3, and 17a-3 thereunder. Additionally, on its own initiative, the Court enjoined Goble from attempting to secure any securities licenses or otherwise attempting to engage in the securities business. The Court also ordered him to pay a reduced civil penalty amount of $7,500 based, in part, on her consideration that Goble’s firm had been liquidated in a Securities Investor Protection Corporation bankruptcy proceeding.
The Commission commenced this action by filing its complaint on May 27, 2008, against North American Clearing, Inc., Goble, its president Bruce Blatman and its former financial and operations principal Timothy Ward. The other defendants previously settled the Commission’s charges against them by consenting, without admitting or denying the Commission’s allegations, to permanent injunctions. Pursuant to his
settlement, the Court previously ordered Blatman to pay a civil penalty. A civil penalty amount against Ward is still to be decided.”