Showing posts with label CONSPIRACY. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CONSPIRACY. Show all posts

Friday, February 27, 2026

THREE PLEAD GUILTY IN ONGOING ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITOR PRICE FIXING INVESTIGATION

FROM:  U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT 
Monday, August 22, 2016
Three Companies Agree to Plead Guilty for Fixing Prices of Electrolytic Capacitors

Rubycon, Elna and Holy Stone Are Latest Companies to Plead Guilty in Ongoing Investigation

Rubycon Corporation, Elna Co., Ltd. and Holy Stone Holdings Co., Ltd. will plead guilty for their roles in a conspiracy to fix prices for electrolytic capacitors sold to customers in the United States and elsewhere, the Department of Justice announced today.

“The Antitrust Division has now charged five companies and one individual for their participation in this international price-fixing conspiracy,” said Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brent Snyder of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division.  “The electrolytic capacitors conspiracy affected millions of American consumers who use electronic devices containing capacitors every day.”

Electrolytic capacitors store and regulate electrical current in a variety of electronic products, including computers, televisions, car engine and airbag systems, home appliances and office equipment.

The division filed one-count felony charges against each of the three companies in U.S. District Court in San Francisco today.  In addition to pleading guilty to the charges against them, each company has agreed to pay a criminal fine and cooperate with the division’s ongoing investigation.  The plea agreements are subject to court approval.

Previously, NEC TOKIN Corp. and Hitachi Chemical Co. Ltd. pleaded guilty to participating in the same worldwide conspiracy.  NEC TOKIN was sentenced to pay a fine of $13.8 million in January 2016, and Hitachi Chemical was sentenced to pay a fine of $3.8 million in June 2016.  On March 12, 2015, a grand jury indicted Takuro Isawa, a former Global Sales General Manager for one of the capacitor manufacturers, for his alleged participation in the conspiracy.

The charges today results from an ongoing federal antitrust investigation being conducted by the Antitrust Division’s San Francisco Office and the FBI’s San Francisco Field Office into price fixing, bid rigging and other anticompetitive conduct in the capacitor industry.

Monday, April 11, 2016

SHIPPING COMPANY WILL PAY $2.5 MILLION FOR OIL DISCHARGE

FROM:  U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT 
Friday, April 8, 2016
Norwegian Shipping Company Sentenced in Alabama to Pay $2.5 Million for Illegally Discharging Oil into the Ocean

The Norwegian shipping company DSD Shipping (DSD) was sentenced to pay a total corporate penalty of $2.5 million as a result of its convictions in Mobile, Alabama, for obstructing justice, violating the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships (APPS), tampering with witnesses and conspiring to commit these offenses.  The company was ordered to pay $500,000 of the penalty to the Dauphin Island Sea Lab Foundation to fund marine research and enhance coastal habitats in the Gulf of Mexico and Mobile Bay.

In addition, DSD was placed on a three year term of probation and was ordered to implement an environmental compliance plan to ensure the company’s vessels obeyed domestic and international environmental regulations in the future.  The sentence was announced by Assistant Attorney General John C. Cruden for the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division and U.S. Attorney Kenyen R. Brown for the Southern District of Alabama.

The operation of commercial marine vessels generates large quantities of waste oil, oil-contaminated waste water and garbage.  International and U.S. law forbid the discharge of waste oil and garbage into the ocean and require that these vessels use pollution prevention equipment, known as an oily-water separator, to prevent the discharge of oil-contaminated waste water.  Should any overboard discharges occur, they must be documented in either an oil record book or a garbage record book, logs that are regularly inspected by the U.S. Coast Guard.

The evidence demonstrated at trial that DSD operated the M/T Stavanger Blossom, a 56,000 gross ton crude oil tanker, from 2010 to 2014 without an operable oily-water separator as required by law.  On Jan. 29, 2010, an internal corporate memorandum written by a vessel engineer warned DSD that the pollution prevention equipment did not work.  The memo further warned that if the problem was not addressed, “some day, it might end up that someone is getting caught for polluting.”  However, rather than repair or replace the oily-water separator, DSD operated the vessel illegally for the next 57 months before the conduct was identified by U.S. Coast Guard inspectors in November 2014.  As the testimony at trial revealed, DSD illegally discharged approximately 20,000 gallons of oil-contaminated waste water and plastic bags containing 270 gallons of sludge into the ocean during the last two-and-a-half months of the vessel’s operation.

The evidence also established that DSD lied about these activities by maintaining fictitious record books aboard the vessel.  These records omitted the illegal discharges of oil and garbage and falsely claimed that pollution prevention equipment was used when it was not.  Further, when the U.S. Coast Guard examined the ship, DSD’s senior ship officers lied about the discharges and ordered their subordinates to do the same.

In court documents filed prior to sentencing, prosecutors informed the court that despite convictions for eight felony offenses, DSD continued to deny wrongdoing in Norwegian press accounts.  Prosecutors also noted that previous deficiencies in the operation of pollution prevention equipment had been identified in other DSD vessels while they were in international ports.

Three senior engineering officers employed by DSD to operate the ship were also sentenced.  Defendant Bo Gao, chief engineer of the vessel, and Xiaobing Chen, second engineer of the vessel, were both sentenced to six months imprisonment as a result of their conduct.  Defendant Xin Zhong, fourth engineer of the vessel, was sentenced to two months imprisonment.  All three also face the loss of their marine engineering license and exclusion from employment in the merchant marine.  A fourth DSD employee, Daniel Paul Dancu, pleaded guilty in October 2015, and will be sentenced on April 11, 2016.

“We will continue to aggressively prosecute and hold accountable those shipping companies who flout the laws that protect our oceans and coastal waterways from harmful vessel pollution and waste,” said Assistant Attorney General Cruden.  “It is fitting that a portion of this penalty will go towards repairing and protecting the Gulf coastal environment that is threatened by these illegal discharges.  This egregious abuse of the seas we share as a nation and an international community must stop.”

“We are very pleased with the fines and custody sentences imposed by the court in the case today,” announced U.S. Attorney Brown. “The fine and probation imposed against DSD, and the custody sentence imposed on the engineering officers reflect the seriousness of the offenses committed against the United States and the environment.  The U.S. Attorney’s Office will continue to investigate and prosecute environmental crimes.  It is incumbent upon all individuals and corporations to protect our environment and the resources along the Northern Gulf of Mexico.”

“The Coast Guard will not tolerate the pollution of our marine environment,” said Rear Admiral Dave Callahan for the Eighth Coast Guard District Commander.  “The individuals committing environmental crimes are putting our natural resources at risk and they must be held accountable.  I am thankful for the hard work and dedication that Coast Guard Sector Mobile, the Coast Guard Investigative Service, the Department of Justice, and the Environmental Protection Agency have put into the investigation and prosecution of this case.”

“The Coast Guard Investigative Service is deeply committed to protecting our nation’s waters and ensuring that those within the commercial shipping industry are good stewards of the marine environment,” said Director Michael Berkow for the Coast Guard Investigative Service.  “Sadly, although entirely preventable, pollution from vessels remains all too common. We hope the sentences in this case deter others from committing similar conduct.  We are grateful to our investigative partners for their assistance in the prosecution of this case.”

“When a company fails to comply with our nation’s environmental laws, it can have a devastating effect on both public health and wildlife,” said Special Agent in Charge Andy Castro of EPA’s criminal enforcement program in Alabama.  “The defendants knowingly discharged oily waste from a vessel into the open water and then tried to cover up their crimes by falsifying entries in the vessel’s log books.  This successful prosecution is another example of the effective partnership between the Department of Justice, the Coast Guard and EPA to protect the environment and our natural resources.”

This case was investigated by the U.S. Coast Guard Sector Mobile, U.S. Coast Guard District Eight, the Coast Guard Investigative Service, and the EPA’s Criminal Investigations Division.  Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael D. Anderson, with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Alabama, and Trial Attorney Shane N. Waller, with the Department of Justice’s Environmental Crimes Section, prosecuted the case.

Sunday, January 10, 2016

IMPORTER TO PAY $15 MILLION TO SETTLE CASE INVOLVING ALLEGED EVASION OF CUSTOMS DUTIES

FROM:  U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT 
Monday, December 21, 2015
Texas-Based Importers Agree to Pay $15 Million to Settle False Claims Act Suit for Alleged Evasion of Customs Duties

The Department of Justice announced today that University Furnishings LP and its general partner, Freedom Furniture Group Inc. (collectively University Furnishings) agreed to pay $15 million to resolve a lawsuit brought under the False Claims Act alleging that the companies made or conspired with others to make false statements to avoid paying duties on wooden bedroom furniture imported from the People’s Republic of China.  Texas-based University Furnishings sells furniture for student housing.

“Those who introduce goods into the United States must comply with the law, including the payment of customs duties meant to protect domestic companies and American workers from unfair competition abroad,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Benjamin C. Mizer, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Division.  “The Department of Justice will zealously pursue those who seek an unfair advantage in U.S. markets by evading the duties owed on goods imported into this country.”

The government alleged that between 2009 and mid-2012, University Furnishings knowingly misclassified or conspired with others to misclassify wooden bedroom furniture on documents presented to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to avoid paying antidumping duties on imports of wooden bedroom furniture manufactured in the People’s Republic of China.  Specifically, University Furnishings allegedly classified the furniture as office and other types of furniture not subject to duties while selling the furniture in the student housing market for use in dormitory bedrooms.  The Department of Commerce assesses and CBP collects antidumping duties to protect U.S. businesses by offsetting unfair foreign pricing and foreign government subsidies.  

“Companies that cheat, by fraudulently mislabeling their imports, undermine U.S. manufacturers and others that obey the rules, and hurt consumers and taxpayers,” said U.S. Attorney Richard L. Durbin Jr. of the Western District of Texas.  “We are hopeful that today’s settlement will help deter others from this type of scheme.”

The allegations resolved by the settlement were originally brought by University Loft Company under the qui tam or whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act.  The act permits private parties to sue on behalf of the United States those who falsely claim federal funds or, as in this case, those who avoid paying funds owed to the government or cause or conspire in such conduct.  The act also allows the whistleblower to receive a share of any funds recovered through the lawsuit.  University Loft Company will receive $2.25 million as its share of the settlement.

The case was handled by the Civil Division’s Commercial Litigation Branch, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Texas, CBP’s Office of Field Operations, Office of Regulatory Audit and Office of Chief Counsel; and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations.

The lawsuit is captioned United States ex rel. University Loft Company v. University Furnishings, LP, et al., No. A13-CV-678 (W.D. Tex.).  The claims resolved by this settlement are allegations only; there has been no determination of liability.

Sunday, November 23, 2014

MEDICAL DEVICE COMPANY AND CEO CHARGED WITH SELLING UNAPPROVED MEDICAL DEVICES

FROM:  U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT 
Thursday, November 13, 2014
Vascular Solutions Inc. and its CEO Charged with Selling Unapproved Medical Devices and Conspiring to Defraud the United States

An indictment was filed today charging Vascular Solutions Inc. (VSI) and its chief executive officer, Howard Root, with selling medical devices without U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval and conspiring to defraud the United States by concealing the illegal sales activity.  The announcement was made today by Acting Assistant Attorney General Joyce R. Branda for the U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Division, U.S. Attorney Robert Pitman for the Western District of Texas and Special Agent in Charge Antoinette V. Henry of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)’s Office of Criminal Investigations, Metro Washington Field Office. The devices at issue are from VSI's “Vari-Lase” product line, a system designed to treat varicose veins by burning or “ablating” them with laser energy.

Root and VSI are each charged with one count of conspiracy and eight counts of introducing adulterated and misbranded medical devices into interstate commerce.  The case is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas.

“These charges involve a deceptive sales campaign led by the CEO of a public company,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Branda.  “The indictment charges that the sales campaign persisted in the face of FDA warnings, a whistleblower’s complaint to the CEO and a failed clinical trial showing that the device was less safe and less effective than a product that had already been approved.  We will take action to hold corporations and their leaders responsible when they violate laws intended to protect public health.”

According to the indictment, the Vari-Lase products were cleared by the FDA only for the treatment of superficial veins, but Root and VSI sold them for the ablation, or removal, of “perforator” veins, which connect the superficial vein system to the deep vein system.  Because perforator veins come into direct contact with deep veins, treating them with lasers was a more difficult and risky procedure.

Root is charged with leading the illegal sales campaign, which lasted from 2007 until 2014, and conspiring with others to hide it from the FDA.  The indictment alleges that Root authorized the campaign after VSI failed to obtain FDA authorization to sell the Vari-Lase system for ablation of perforator veins.  The sales campaign is alleged to have ignored FDA concerns about the safety and effectiveness of the procedure and specific warnings from the FDA not to sell Vari-Lase products for treatment of perforator veins.  The indictment alleges that, with Root’s approval, the sales continued even after the company sponsored an unsuccessful clinical trial that showed that the Vari-Lase system was less safe and effective than a competing device that the FDA had cleared for perforator vein treatment.  According to the indictment, the sales continued even after a whistleblower complained to Root in 2009 and the government told the company about its investigation in 2011.

The indictment also charges VSI and Root with deceiving the FDA.  In late 2007, Root decided to launch a special “Short Kit” designed for perforator vein treatment, despite the lack of FDA marketing authorization, by claiming that the product was intended for “short vein segments” or “short veins.”  At the same time, the government alleged that internal company documents approved by Root taught the sales force that these terms included perforator veins and urged salespeople to suggest to health care providers that Vari-Lase devices could be used to treat perforator veins.  After learning about the government’s investigation, members of the sales force began using the term “short vein segments” in field trip reports to disguise that they were still selling Vari-Lase devices for perforator vein treatment, according to the indictment.  Two other members of the sales force are alleged to have misled investigators; in addition, the indictment charges that one member falsely denied his conduct and another tried to scapegoat a low-level salesman.

In July 2014, VSI agreed to pay $520,000 to resolve allegations that it caused false claims to be submitted to federal health programs by marketing the Vari-Lase devices for treating perforator veins.  In that civil action, the government alleged that VSI knowingly caused physicians and other purchasers of the Short Kit to submit false claims to federal health care programs for uses of the Short Kit that were not reimbursable.

“FDA is committed to protecting the public health and the integrity of the regulatory system,” said Special Agent in Charge Henry.

The case is being prosecuted by Trial Attorney Timothy Finley of the Civil Division’s Consumer Protection Branch and Assistant U.S. Attorney Bud Paulissen of the Western District of Texas.  The case was investigated by the FDA’s Office of Criminal Investigations and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of the Inspector General.

An indictment is merely an allegation, and every defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Tuesday, October 15, 2013

TWO INDICTED IN PENNY STOCK SECURITIES FRAUD INVOLVING COMPANY THEY CONTROLLED

FROM:  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
Two Penny Stock Promoters Indicted for Securities Fraud Following the SEC's Investigation of ConnectAJet.Com, Inc.

On September 11, 2013, the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Texas obtained a Grand Jury indictment against Jason Wynn and Martin Cantu for their role in a conspiracy to defraud prospective investors in a penny stock company that they controlled, ConnectAJet.com, Inc. (“ConnectAJet”).  The indictment was unsealed on September 19.  According to ConnectAJet’s press releases, ConnectAJet was developing a first-of-its-kind online booking system for private jet charters.  The indictment alleges that – to artificially boost demand for ConnectAJet stock – Wynn and Cantu issued several false public statements and advertisements that misled potential investors about (1) the progress and status of the company’s real-time booking system, (2) ConnectAJet’s relationships with other companies in the private jet industry, and (3) ConnectAJet’s customer base.  Based on that conduct, the indictment charges Wynn and Cantu with Conspiracy to Commit Securities Fraud in violation of Sections 10(b) and 32 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Aiding and Abetting Securities Fraud under those two provisions.

The allegations in the criminal indictment stem from the same misconduct underlying the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (the “Commission’s”) prior investigation of ConnectAJet and the Commission’s prior civil enforcement actions against Wynn and Cantu.  On March 13, 2008, the Commission sued Jason Wynn and others for their role in a series of illegal, unregistered stock offerings in several penny stock companies, including ConnectAJet.  SEC v. Reynolds, et al., Case No. 3:08-cv-00438-B (N.D. Tex.).  In its Complaint, the Commission alleged that Wynn repeatedly engaged in a “pump and dump” of ConnectAJet and other companies.  The Complaint alleged that for each company, Wynn and his fellow penny stock promoters (a) organized a reverse merger of the company into a public shell, (b) purchased large blocks of the company’s stock at pennies per share in a bogus unregistered private offering, (c) created initial trading volume for the stock by selling some shares to a tightly controlled group of friends and family members, (d) touted the stock through spam e-mail, sham internet sites, and millions of direct mail advertisements, and then (e) dumped their shares on the investing public without the protection of registration at prices grossly inflated by their promotional activity.  On October 13, 2011, the Court entered partial judgment against Jason Wynn based on his consent and ordered that Wynn be permanently enjoined from further violations of the antifraud and registration provisions of federal securities law and be permanently barred from participating in any offerings of penny stock.  On July 11, 2013, the Court further ordered that Wynn and his corporate proxies pay $8,778,887 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest and $1,300,000 in civil penalties.

On September 2009, the Commission separately sued Martin T. Cantu and others in SEC v. ConnectAJet.com, Inc. et al., Case No. 3:09-cv-01742-B (N.D. Tex.).  The Commission alleged that Cantu participated in the scheme to “pump and dump” ConnectAJet stock and issued several false press releases and advertisements to further the scheme.  On July 23, 2010, the Commission obtained a judgment against Cantu that (a) enjoined him from further violations of the antifraud and registration provisions of federal securities law, (b) permanently barred him from serving as an officer and director of a public company, (c) permanently barred him from participating in a penny stock offering, (d) required him to pay $632,327 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest, and (e) required him to pay a civil penalty of $260,000.

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

3 CORPORATIONS, 6 INDIVIDUALS CHARGED IN BIOFUELS FRAUD SCHEME

FROM:  U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT 
Wednesday, September 18, 2013
Six Individuals, Three Corporations Charged in Indiana-based Biofuels Fraud Scheme

The Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Indiana announced today the return of two indictments against six individuals and three companies for offenses involving federal renewable fuel programs, allegedly creating losses to victims totaling more than $100 million. The 88 counts included in the three charging documents include allegations of conspiracy, wire fraud, false tax claims, false statements under the Clean Air Act, obstruction of justice, money laundering and securities fraud.

“Congress enacted incentives for the production of biofuels to make the United States stronger and more energy independent,” said Robert G. Dreher, Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division. “Fraud by parties claiming such incentives threatens these important public policies. The Justice Department will vigorously prosecute those seeking to line their pockets using scams like those alleged in this indictment.”

 “This morning, federal agents brought into custody individuals who allegedly operated the largest tax and securities fraud scheme in Indiana history,” said U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana Joseph H. Hogsett. “This case represents a collaborative effort on the part of law enforcement to hold fully accountable those who seek personal profit at the taxpayer’s expense.”

“The Renewable Fuel Standard Program was designed to achieve greenhouse gas emission reductions, promote energy independence and expand our nation’s renewable fuels sector,” said Cynthia Giles, Assistant Administrator for Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). “Today’s action supports these goals by protecting the integrity of the biofuel market. Those that cheat the system are breaking the law, and undermine our commitment to protect public health and the environment.”

“We are proud to work with our federal partners to identify and investigate groups that manipulate and utilize federal government programs to line their pockets by fraud,” said Robert A. Jones, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI Indianapolis Division. “In doing so, they deceive their customers, their shareholders, and the American public. The FBI will continue the fight against this dishonest and fraudulent behavior which harms the American people and the American economy.”

“The indictments returned today send a loud message that IRS Criminal Investigation operates year round to protect the integrity of our tax system and today is a victory for the American people,” said James C. Lee, Special Agent in Charge, IRS Criminal Investigation. “Together with the cooperative efforts of our law enforcement partners, we were able to identify and vigorously investigate the fraud involved in this scheme.”
 
 The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 created a number of federally-funded programs that provided monetary incentives for the production of biodiesel. A dollar-per-gallon tax credit was available only to the first person to blend the pure biodiesel (known as B100) with petroleum diesel. After the biodiesel was blended and the tax credit claimed, the resulting product was generally known in the industry as B99, meaning that it was approximately 99 percent biodiesel and 1 percent petroleum diesel. Additionally, biodiesel producers could generate and attach credits known as “renewable identification numbers” or RINs to biodiesel they produced. Because certain companies need RINs to comply with regulatory obligations, RINs have significant market value. These two incentives were available only once for any given volume of biodiesel. For these reasons, a gallon of B100 with RINs and an available tax credit was worth much more than a gallon of RIN-stripped B99. At times during the conspiracy, a gallon of B100 was worth up to $2.50 more than an equivalent gallon of B99.

 Four of the defendants—Craig Ducey, Chad Ducey, Chris Ducey and Brian Carmichael— operated E Biofuels, a Middletown, Indiana company that held itself out as a producer of biodiesel from “feedstocks” such as animal fat and vegetable oils. The government alleges that these defendants conspired with Joseph Furando and Evelyn Katirina Pattison—two executives with a pair of related New Jersey-based companies that operated under the names Caravan Trading Company and CIMA Green—to purchase RIN-stripped B99 from third parties, pretend that E-Biofuels had produced that fuel at its Middletown facility and fraudulently resell that fuel to customers as B100 with RINs and an available tax credit. While the E-Biofuels facility was capable of producing B100, at times during the conspiracy it was producing no fuel of its own, but instead was simply acting as a pass-through facility for fuel purchased elsewhere.

 The indictment alleges that beginning in July 2009 and continuing until May 2012, these defendants fraudulently sold more than 35 million gallons of RIN-stripped B99 to unwitting customers who paid an inflated price, thinking they were purchasing B100 with RINs and an available tax credit. All told, the customers were allegedly defrauded of more than $55 million as a result of these activities and the Internal Revenue Service was exposed to as much as $35 million in false claims.

 The government alleges that the defendants delivered the fraudulently mislabeled fuel to the victims in one of three ways. In some cases, the biodiesel was transported from fuel terminals to the E-Biofuels facility in Middletown where it was unloaded into a holding tank. A short time later, the biodiesel would be reloaded into tanker trucks and delivered to unsuspecting customers along with fraudulent paperwork that misidentified it as B100 with RINs produced by E-Biofuels. On other occasions, the truck drivers did not unload the fuel when they arrived at Middletown plant. Instead, they simply picked up paperwork falsely stating that the truck contained a load of B100 with RINs that originated at the E-Biofuels facility. The truck drivers referred to this procedure as “flipping a load.”

 Finally, in the most egregious instances, the truck drivers hauled RIN-stripped B99 from fuel terminals directly to customers. Because these loads never went to the E-Biofuels facility they were known as “ghost loads” or “phantom loads.” In those cases, the defendants faxed or e-mailed the false paperwork to the truck drivers along their routes between the fuel terminals and the customer locations.              

 In May 2010, E-Biofuels was purchased by Imperial Petroleum, a publicly traded company based in Evansville. After the acquisition, E-Biofuels accounted for more than 97% of Imperial Petroleum’s operating income. Defendant Jeffrey Wilson was the president and chief executive officer of Imperial Petroleum.

 The government alleges that Jeffrey Wilson and Craig Ducey knew that E-Biofuels was purchasing biodiesel from third parties instead of making its own biodiesel. They hid this fact from Imperial’s investors, shareholders and outside auditors by falsely stating that E-Biofuels produced biodiesel from chicken fat and other feedstocks. They made these and other related false statements and omissions in Imperial Petroleum’s annual and quarterly reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in written and oral communications with Imperial Petroleum’s investors and outside auditors.      
 
 If found guilty, the six individuals charged by indictment face up to 20 years in federal prison on some counts, as well as significant fines. The three companies indicted today also face significant fines and other regulatory action. The defendants were scheduled for initial appearances before a federal magistrate judge today.

 An additional defendant was charged today by federal information, and has petitioned the court to enter a plea of guilty and cooperate with investigators.  Brian Carmichael was charged with one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States. Carmichael has filed a petition with the court indicating his willingness to plead guilty to this charge. Carmichael faces up to five years in federal prison if convicted.

The case is being prosecuted by Senior Litigation Counsel Steven D. DeBrota of the U.S. Attorney’s Office, along with Senior Counsel Thomas Ballantine of the Environmental Crimes Section in the Department of Justice’s Environment and Natural Resources Division, and Jake Schmidt, a Special Assistant U.S. Attorney of the U.S. Attorney’s Office and Senior Attorney for the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 An indictment is only a charge and is not evidence of guilt. All defendants are presumed innocent and are entitled to a fair trial at which the government must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
 
 The collaborative investigation that led to today’s arrests was the result of work by the EPA’s Criminal Investigation Division, the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation, the FBI, the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Indiana Department of Environmental Management.

Thursday, September 19, 2013

PEST CONTROL COMPANY AND OWNER CHARGED WITH UNLAWFUL APPLICATION OF PESTICIDES

FROM:  U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
Wednesday, September 11, 2013
Pest Control Company and Its Owner Charged with Unlawful Application of Pesticides and Falsification

A pest control services company and its owner have been charged today in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia with conspiracy, unlawful use of pesticides, false statements, falsification of records and mail fraud, announced Robert G. Dreher, Acting Assistant Attorney General of the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division and Michael J. Moore, U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Georgia.

Steven A. Murray, 54, of Pelham, Ala., and his company, Bio-Tech Management Inc., were charged in a felony indictment with one count of conspiracy, 10 counts of making false statements, 20 counts of falsifying records, 10 counts of mail fraud and 10 counts of unlawful use of a pesticide.

The indictment alleges that from October 2005 to June 2009, Steven Murray and Bio-Tech repeatedly misapplied the registered pesticide Termidor SC in nursing homes in the state of Georgia and falsified documents to conceal the unlawful use.  The indictment further alleges that Murray and Bio-Tech sent invoices through the U.S. Mail to their nursing home clients to solicit payment for the unlawful pesticide applications.  

According to the indictment, Steve Murray and Bio-Tech provided monthly pest control services to nursing homes in Georgia by spraying pesticides in and around their clients’ facilities.  The indictment alleges that, at the direction of Murray, Bio-Tech employees routinely applied the pesticide Termidor indoors more than twice a year, contrary to the manufacturer’s label instructions.  The indictment further alleges that after the Georgia Department of Agriculture made inquiries regarding Bio-Tech’s misuse of Termidor and other pesticides, Murray directed several of his Bio-Tech employees to alter company service reports with the intent to obstruct an investigation.        

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations require that all pesticides be registered, properly labeled, and applied as specified by manufacturer’s labeling to protect public health and the environment.

A criminal indictment is not a finding of guilt.  An individual or company charged by criminal indictment is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law.

The falsifying records and mail fraud charge carry a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison and $250,000 fine per count.  The false statements charges each carry a maximum sentence of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

These cases are being investigated by Special Agents of the EPA’s Criminal Investigations Division in Atlanta and prosecuted by Trial Attorneys Richard J. Powers and Adam C. Cullman of the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division, Environmental Crimes Section.