Wednesday, October 22, 2014

TEXAS BUSINESS OWNER INDICTED FOR FAILING TO REPORT OVR $1.6 MILLION IN CASH TRANSACTIONS

FROM:  U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT 
Monday, October 20, 2014
Owner of Texas Perfume Business Indicted for Violating Cash Reporting Requirements Involving More Than $1.6 million

The owner and president of a wholesale and retail perfume store in Laredo, Texas, was indicted by a federal grand jury today on 44 counts of causing his business to fail to report cash transactions of more than $10,000.

Assistant Attorney General Leslie R. Caldwell of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and U.S. Attorney Kenneth Magidson of the Southern District of Texas made the announcement.

The indictment alleges that Virender Sharma, 59, of Laredo, Texas, was the owner and president of T.M. Perfumes, and was responsible for complying with the cash reporting requirements for the company.  Despite knowing of his filing obligations since 2006, Sharma allegedly caused the business to fail to report at least 44 cash transactions exceeding $10,000 between June 2009 and July 2010, which totaled more than $1.6 million.

The charges contained in an indictment are merely accusations, and a defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

The case was investigated by the Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigation and the Drug Enforcement Administration.  The case is being prosecuted by Trial Attorney Keith Liddle of the Criminal Division’s Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section and Assistant U.S. Attorney Ted Imperato of the Southern District of Texas.

Sunday, October 19, 2014

CFTC SETTLES ACTION AGAINST FUTURES COMMISSION MERCHANT

FROM:  U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 
CFTC Settles Action against Friedberg Mercantile Group, Inc., a Registered Futures Commission Merchant, for Secured Amount Deficiency, Commingling of Customer Funds and Failure to Timely Report Secured Amount Deficiency

Washington, DC — The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today announced that it entered an order requiring Friedberg Mercantile Group, Inc. (Friedberg), a registered Futures Commission Merchant (FCM) in Toronto, Canada, to pay a $70,000 civil monetary penalty for a secured amount deficiency of approximately $240,000 on February 5, 2013, commingling of customer funds with its proprietary funds on February 6, 2013, and failure to timely notify the CFTC of the February 5, 2013 secured amount deficiency as required.

Friedberg is a subsidiary of Canadian broker-dealer Friedberg Mercantile Group, Ltd., also in Toronto. The company maintains a futures business to accommodate its securities customers who wish to trade futures and is one of the smallest FCMs as measured by customer assets required in segregation.

The CFTC Order finds that Friedberg’s handling of a customer request to transfer $300,000 of segregated funds to secured funds caused Friedberg to be under its secured amount requirement by approximately $240,000 on February 5, 2013, and its subsequent movement of funds to its secured account in connection with the same customer request resulted in Friedberg improperly commingling customer funds with its proprietary funds on February 6, 2013.

According to the CFTC Order, Friedberg failed to timely notify the CFTC of the February 5, 2013 secured amount deficiency as required.

The CFTC’s Order requires Friedberg to cease and desist from further violations of the CFTC Regulations charged in the Order, and imposes a $70,000 civil monetary penalty.

The CFTC staff members responsible for this matter are Division of Enforcement staff Susan Gradman, Allison Passman, Joseph Patrick, Scott Williamson, Rosemary Hollinger, and Richard Wagner, and Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight staff Nicholas Chiacchere, Robert Loeber, Gerald Nudge and Kevin Piccoli.

Media Contact

Wednesday, October 15, 2014

NURSING CARE COMPANY TO PAY $38 MILLION TO SETTLE FALSE CLAIMS ACT ALLEGATIONS

FROM:  U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
Friday, October 10, 2014
Extendicare Health Services Inc. Agrees to Pay $38 Million to Settle False Claims Act Allegations Relating to the Provision of Substandard Nursing Care and Medically Unnecessary Rehabilitation Therapy

Extendicare Health Services Inc. (Extendicare) and its subsidiary Progressive Step Corporation (ProStep) have agreed to pay $38 million to the United States and eight states to resolve allegations that Extendicare billed Medicare and Medicaid for materially substandard nursing services that were so deficient that they were effectively worthless and billed Medicare for medically unreasonable and unnecessary rehabilitation therapy services, the Justice Department and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG) jointly announced today.  This resolution is the largest failure of care settlement with a chain-wide skilled nursing facility in the department’s history.

As part of this settlement, Extendicare has also been required to enter into a five year chain-wide Corporate Integrity Agreement with HHS-OIG.  Extendicare is a Delaware corporation that, through its subsidiaries, operates 146 skilled nursing facilities in 11 states.  ProStep provides physical, speech, and occupational rehabilitation services.

“Our seniors rely on the Medicare and Medicaid programs to provide them with quality care, ensuring that they are treated with dignity and respect when they are most vulnerable,” said Acting Associate Attorney General Stuart F. Delery.  “It is critically important that we confront nursing home operators who put their own economic gain ahead of the needs of their residents.  Operators who bill Medicare and Medicaid while failing to provide essential services or bill for services so grossly substandard as to be effectively worthless will be pursued for false claims.”

This settlement resolves allegations that between 2007 and 2013, in 33 of its skilled nursing homes in eight states, Extendicare billed Medicare and Medicaid for materially substandard skilled nursing services and failed to provide care to its residents that met federal and state standards of care and regulatory requirements.  The government alleges, for example, that Extendicare failed to have a sufficient number of skilled nurses to adequately care for its skilled nursing residents; failed to provide adequate catheter care to some of the residents and failed to follow the appropriate protocols to prevent pressure ulcers or falls.  The eight states involved in this component of the settlement are Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Washington and Wisconsin.  

“The continued viability of Medicare depends, in large part, on the honesty and integrity of the program participants,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Joyce R. Branda for the Civil Division.  “Health care providers must make decisions regarding the level of services to be provided based solely on their patients’ clinical needs, and not corporate financial targets.”  

“This investigation and settlement highlights the importance of leveraging the joint resources and expertise of the states and federal government,” said Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine.  “Working together allowed us to focus our efforts nationally on protecting the most vulnerable in our population who rely on quality care in our nursing homes.”

Additionally, this settlement resolves allegations that between 2007 and 2013, in 33 of its skilled nursing homes, Extendicare provided medically unreasonable and unnecessary rehabilitation therapy services to its Medicare Part A beneficiaries, particularly during the patients’ assessment reference periods, so that it could bill Medicare for those patients at the highest per diem rate possible.  

As a result of today’s settlement, the federal government will receive $32.3 million and the eight state Medicaid programs will receive $5.7 million.  The Medicaid program is funded jointly by the federal and state governments.

“The United States remains committed to demanding the highest quality of care for nursing home and skilled facility residents,” said U.S. Attorney Carter M. Stewart for the Southern District of Ohio.  “We are proud of our efforts to work cooperatively with our partners at the Ohio Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, as well as with other U.S. Attorney’s offices across the country.  We will remain vigilant in our efforts to combat healthcare fraud, especially when it impacts the most vulnerable in our society, including seniors and others requiring significant long term care.”

“Nursing home residents should not be subject to unreasonable or unnecessary rehabilitation therapy that is dictated by a company’s profits rather than patient needs,” said U.S. Attorney Zane David Memeger for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.  “It is critical to the integrity of a system that benefits millions of Americans that we do as much as possible to hold accountable those who commit fraudulent acts.  The Eastern District of Pennsylvania will continue its efforts to prevent Medicare fraud and protect government beneficiaries.”

In addition, as part of this resolution, Extendicare and ProStep are required to enter into a five year chain-wide Corporate Integrity Agreement.  It is a priority of the OIG to investigate and pursue cases involving abuse or grossly deficient care of Medicare or Medicaid beneficiaries and to recommend improvements to the systems intended to promote quality of care.  To protect the Federal healthcare programs and its beneficiaries, OIG required Extendicare to agree to a Corporate Integrity Agreement under which Extendicare must have a comprehensive compliance program with systems to address the quality of resident care.  Extendicare’s compliance program must include, among other things, corporate-level committees to address compliance and quality, including a committee to assess staffing, and an internal audit program to assess the quality of care provided to its residents.  Extendicare must retain an independent monitor, selected by the OIG, who will regularly visit Extendicare’s facilities and report to the OIG.  In addition, an independent review organization will perform annual reviews of Extendicare’s claims to Medicare.

“This case demonstrates that the government will aggressively pursue allegations of abuse and grossly deficient care,” said Inspector General Daniel R. Levinson of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.  “Our five-year corporate integrity agreement with Extendicare requires a government-selected quality of care monitor be retained by Extendicare, and additional rigorous provisions designed to ensure Extendicare provides appropriate staffing and monitors the quality of care provided to its residents.”

Under the False Claims Act, private citizens, known as relators, can bring suit on behalf of the United States and share in any recovery.  Two relators brought separate cases against Extendicare.  Relator Tracy Lovvron will receive more than $1.8 million as her share of the recovery in the RUGS upcoding case, and Relator Donald Gallick will receive more than $250,000 as his share of the recovery in the Ohio worthless services case.

This settlement illustrates the government’s emphasis on combating health care fraud and marks another achievement for the Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (HEAT) initiative, which was announced in May 2009 by the Attorney General and the Secretary of Health and Human Services.  The partnership between the two departments has focused efforts to reduce and prevent Medicare and Medicaid financial fraud through enhanced cooperation.  One of the most powerful tools in this effort is the False Claims Act.  Since January 2009, the Justice Department has recovered a total of more than $22.5 billion through False Claims Act cases, with more than $14.3 billion of that amount recovered in cases involving fraud against federal health care programs.

The settlement was the result of a coordinated federal and state effort by the Civil Division, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Ohio, HHS-OIG and the Attorneys General for the states of Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Washington and Wisconsin.  This investigation was also supported by the department’s Elder Justice Initiative, which coordinates the department’s activities combating elder abuse, neglect and financial exploitation, especially as they impact beneficiaries of Medicare, Medicaid and other federal health care programs.

The two qui tam cases are docketed as United States ex rel. Lovvorn v. EHSI, et. al. C.A. 10-1580 (E.D. Pa) and United States ex rel. Gallick et al., v. EHSI et al., C.A. 2:13cv-092 (S.D. Ohio).  The claims resolved by the settlement are allegations only; there has been no determination of liability.

Sunday, October 12, 2014

OVER-BILLING ALLEGATIONS LEADS DEFENSE CONTRACTOR TO PAY $13.7 MILLION

FROM:  U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT 
Tuesday, October 7, 2014
Defense Contractor Agrees to Pay $13.7 Million to Settle Allegations of Overbilling

DRS Technical Services Inc. (DRS) has agreed to pay $13.7 million to settle allegations that it violated the False Claims Act by knowingly overbilling the government for work performed by DRS personnel who lacked the job qualifications required by the contract, the Justice Department announced today.  DRS is located in Herndon, Virginia, and is a subsidiary of DRS Defense Solutions LLC.

DRS designs, integrates, operates and maintains satellite and wireless network solutions and telecommunication services and security systems for government and private sector customers.  DRS C3 & Aviation Company, which is headquartered in Gaithersburg, Maryland, is an indirect subsidiary of DRS and provides services to government agencies, including aircraft maintenance, logistics and depot support, and engineering support.  Between March 2003 and Dec. 31, 2012, DRS and its predecessors were awarded time and materials contracts for services and supplies to be provided to the Army’s Communication and Electronics Command (CECOM) in Iraq and Afghanistan, and to the Coast Guard for aircraft maintenance.

“Contractors that fail to provide qualified labor as promised are not entitled to bill the government as though they had,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Joyce R. Branda for the Justice Department’s Civil Division.  “The Department of Justice will pursue contractors that claim taxpayer funds to which they are not entitled.”

The alleged labor mischarging occurred on the Rapid Response or “R2” contract issued by the U.S. Army Communication and Electronics Command (CECOM) located at the Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland.  The U.S. Army used the R2 contract to purchase a variety of goods and services needed to support U.S. forces in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere on a quick turnaround basis.  The settlement also resolves labor mischarging on a similar U.S. Coast Guard contract.

The government contends that from Jan. 1, 2003, to Dec. 31, 2012, DRS billed CECOM for work performed by individuals whose job qualifications did not meet all the qualifications prescribed by the contracts for the labor categories under which their efforts were billed, thereby falsely increasing the amount of money DRS claimed and CECOM paid.  Similarly, from Dec. 19, 2009, to Dec. 18, 2011, the government contends that DRS charged the Coast Guard’s Aviation Logistics Center for work performed by individuals whose job qualifications did not meet the qualifications prescribed by the contract, again, thereby inflating the cost of the services provided.    

“Companies that submit false bills to the government must be held accountable,” said U.S. Attorney Rod J. Rosenstein for the District of Maryland.

“This settlement is yet another example of the tenacity and hard work of our Army CID agents,” said Director Frank Robey of the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command's Major Procurement Fraud Unit (MPFU).  “It is a testament to MPFU's continued resolve to hold companies accountable for the work they do for the U.S. government.”

The settlement was the result of a coordinated effort by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Maryland, the Civil Division, the Defense Contract Audit Agency, the Army’s Criminal Investigative Command’s MPFU and the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General’s Defense Criminal Investigative Service.  

The claims resolved by the settlements are allegations only and there has been no determination of liability.

Friday, October 10, 2014

COURT GRANTS SUMMARY JUDGEMENT IN MRI INTERNATIONAL INC., PONZI SCHEME

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 23111 / October 10, 2014

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Edwin Yoshihiro Fujinaga and MRI International, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2:13-CV-1658 JCM (CWH) (D. Nev.)

SEC Obtains Summary Judgment Win On Liability in Ponzi Scheme Case

On October 3, 2014, the Honorable James C. Mahan, United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, granted the Securities and Exchange Commission's motion for summary judgment on liability against defendants Edwin Fujinaga and MRI International, Inc. on all charges against them, including violations of the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws.

In a case originally filed on September 11, 2013, the SEC alleged that Fujinaga and his company, MRI, perpetrated an elaborate Ponzi scheme designed to misappropriate money from investors. The SEC alleged that the defendants raised more than $800 million from thousands of investors living primarily in Japan under the ruse that MRI was using their investments to buy medical accounts receivable from medical providers at a discount to recover their full value from insurance companies. The SEC alleged that the defendants used the investments to pay back earlier investors, and that Fujinaga used investor funds for his own purposes, including to buy property and luxury cars. In granting summary judgment in favor of the SEC, the court found that "Fujinaga had sole control over investment funds, using them for his own personal benefit" and, "[w]hile depleting the pool of collected investments, Fujinaga facilitated a Ponzi scheme funded by new investments."

The court's summary judgment opinion finds that Fujinaga and MRI violated Sections 17(a)(1), (2), and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The court has not yet determined the appropriate relief against the defendants, and the litigation is ongoing for remedies purposes. The SEC's case is also continuing against multiple relief defendants, who the SEC alleges received and used investors' funds.

For further information, please see Litigation Release Number 22832 (October 3, 2013) [SEC Obtains Asset Freeze and Other Emergency Relief in Ponzi Scheme Targeting Investors in Japan].

The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Financial Services Agency of Japan and the Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission of Japan in this matter.

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

COURT SHUTS TAX PREPARER DOWN IN FICTITIOUS BUSINESS EXPENSES CASE

FROM:  U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT 
Tuesday, September 30, 2014
Federal Court Shuts Down Florida Tax Return Preparer

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida permanently barred Marvel Angelita Ebanks, a tax preparer who prepared returns in Palm Beach County, Florida, and her company, Marvelous Enterprises Inc., from preparing federal tax returns for others, the Justice Department announced today.  A final judgment of permanent injunction was entered against Ebanks and her company by the court today.

The complaint alleged that Ebanks and her company prepared federal income tax returns for customers that claimed ficticious business expenses.  In addition, Ebanks and her company prepared returns that claimed false or inflated education credits and child care credits, and other deductions and/or credits in order to unlawfully understate tax liabilities and generate larger than warranted refunds.  Pursuant to the final judgment of permanent injunction, Ebanks and her company are permanently enjoined from preparing or assisting in the preparation or filing of federal tax returns and amended returns.

Return-preparer fraud is one of the IRS’ Dirty Dozen Tax Scams for 2014.  The IRS has some tips on their website for choosing a tax preparer.  In the past decade, the Tax Division has obtained injunctions against hundreds of fraudulent tax preparers.  Information about these cases is available on the Justice Department website.  An alphabetical listing of persons enjoined from preparing returns and promoting tax schemes can be found on this page.  If you believe that one of the enjoined persons or businesses may be violating an injunction, please contact the Tax DivisionEmail links icon with details.